Thursday, July 16, 2009

Formula Ads: How Far Is Too Far?

Although formula companies have always used aggressive marketing tactics to sell their products to as many people as possible, it seems lately they've upped the ante. Tanya at Motherwear recently blogged about Enfamil's latest deceptive marketing tactic: calling one of their formulas "The Breast Milk Formula" and having that as the title of their web page. At the time Tanya called this the most blatant form of unethical marketing she'd ever seen. Perhaps she spoke too soon.

It seems now Abbott Pharmaceuticals, makers of Similac, are trying to one-up Enfamil. Their latest tactics? The celebrity endorsement (ads featuring Extreme Home Makeover's Ty Pennington) and now, placing ads for formula in magazines not directly aimed at parents. Of course you expect to see tons of formula ads in magazines like Parenting, Parents, American Baby, etc. The entire magazines seem to be one giant advertisement for formula and although I don't think it's right (and it's a violation of the WHO Code), it makes sense to use your dollars wisely and aim for your target audience: people who have kids.

This week Similac has a 4-page spread in People magazine for its new "Early Shield" formula, which supposedly offers immune system health through a combination of "prebiotics, nucleotides and antioxidants." The ad was on thick, glossy paper and had to cost Similac a pretty penny. If you haven't seen the ad, check out the scans below.






Again, this ad appeared in People, a celebrity weekly. People, that has nothing to do with parenting, kids or babies, but does have a large female readership of childbearing age. It's depressing to think that before women are even thinking of having kids, they are now going to be bombarded with messages from the formula companies. Formula companies have the big bucks to spend on gorgeous images like the ones above of adorable, serene babies who are dependent on Similac to provide them with their immune system health. The science is bogus but the Lactivist community just can't counter offer a positive breastfeeding message because we don't have the dollars to create similar ads. Best for Babes' campaign is a good start, but how can you compete with giant pharma companies?

We do still have the power to effect change. After complaints to the Federal Trade Commission, Enfamil changed its website from "the breast formula" to "Enfamil Lipil." Let's inundate the FTC with complaints about these types of ads as well. You should also write or tweet People magazine and let them know how you feel about these types of ads. I am posting below a letter that Marsha Walker, IBCLC and Executive Director of the National Alliance for Breastfeeding Advocacy, sent to People. Marsha has given permission for anyone to use all or part of her letter as well.


I was quite dismayed to see advertising for infant formula in your
magazine and on your Celebrity Baby Blog website. As you know, this is
a product that competes unfairly with breastfeeding, something which
many of your profiled celebrities practice. The appearance of infant
formula advertising next to photos of celebrities and their babies
implies that famous people use the product and so should readers of
your magazine and website. The use of infant formula increases the risk
of unhealthy outcomes for infants and mothers, something you would not
wish to promote. The Federal Government and all major health agencies
and organizations recommend breastfeeding as the preferred method of
feeding babies. The Healthy People 2010 health goals for the nation
from the Department of Health and Human Services specifically targets
the increase of breastfeeding as a public health intervention to reduce
acute and chronic diseases and conditions and as a method of lowering
the expenditure of scarce health care dollars.

As a way to improve the health of your readership and their children,
please consider running pro bono ads for breastfeeding in fairness to a
public health behavior that does not have large amounts of corporate
promotion dollars. Your magazine and website reach millions of women in
their childbearing years who would benefit greatly from your support of
breastfeeding.

Should you wish more information or copies of breastfeeding ads to be
placed in your magazine and on your website, please do not hesitate to
contact me.

Thank you for your time.

Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Executive Director
National Alliance for Breastfeeding Advocacy


Marsha also discussed this new trend some more with me. This is what she had to say:

Formula ads in mainstream magazines and websites is the latest tactic in formula marketing strategy. Banner ads for formula have been saturating the internet at sites than women frequent having nothing to do with children or parenting. Not only is formula marketing permeating new sites but the aggressiveness of the language used in the ads have reached new lows. Spurious claims on company websites declare that their products contain the same ingredients as breast milk, that these manufactured ingredients perform the same way that breast milk does, and that infants fed these products will enjoy the same health and cognitive outcomes as breastfed infants. Obviously, many people think the two are the same thing, especially when the terms “infant formula” and “breast milk” appear next to each other in the same sentence as equivalent nutritional sources. This was seen in a study using a Health Styles Questionnaire. In 1999, 2636 people were sampled and asked if they agreed or disagreed with a number of health statements including “Infant formula is as good as breast milk.” In 1999, 14.3% agreed with that statement. When the study was repeated in 2003, 25% of the sample agreed with the statement. Mothers have made the following statements:
• “I want the breastmilk formula”
• “I want the formula with breastmilk in it”
• “Whose breastmilk is in the formula?”

False and misleading advertising seems to work. It's time that the FTC take action against those companies that continuously misrepresent their products. The FTC needs to receive hundreds of complaints from consumers asking that this be investigated and action taken to curb this flood of deceit. Please take the time to register your complaint with the FTC today.



Never want to miss an update of the Blacktating Blog? Subscribe here.
Twitter me- I'm blacktating


14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Here's the content of my email to People magazine - feel free to use!
I was very disappointed to find advertising for infant formula in your magazine and on your web site.

Clearly the formula manufacturers have large advertising budgets, but the damage done by this kind of advertising cannot be worth the money. I am referring to the health of your readership and their children. You must realize that nothing can replace breast milk and breastfeeding, and also you must realize that the advocates of breastfeeding do not have those same advertising budgets.

You are in a position to influence the choices of many women. If women are misled into believing that formula is at all comparable to breast milk, more mothers will choose to bottle feed, if only to avoid dealing with reactions to the act of breastfeeding. You are in a position to influence the culture around breastfeeding to your large readership, and of educating women around providing their children with the best nutrition and care possible. This would be a noble thing, and one that is very important!
Andrea

Elita said...

Andrea,
I love your letter! Thanks for sharing it.

Bettina said...

Fabulous post. Let's all circulate whereever we can and apply consumer pressure. Consider that the formula industry spent $50 million in advertising in 2004; most breastfeeding non-profits have operating budgets of a few ten thousands or hundred thousands. Worse, one of the formula companies (I think it's Abbott, not sure) spends $300 million annually on marketing formula, of which their direct advertising budget includes the diaper bags with "free" formula samples given away at hospitals, sponsored health conferences, publishing literature for the American Academy of Pediatrics, the list never ends. I used formula and will defend a woman's decision; but the false advertising of formula and the unethical marketing to vulnerable expecting and new mothers is truly a disgrace.

Anonymous said...

I'm a nursing mom of three, the youngest a 2½-year-old nursling and I'm not surprised by this at all. In fact, the only thing that surprises me is the misconception in the post that this is something new ("LATELY they've upped the ante..."; "it seems NOW ... are trying to one-up..."; "...are NOW going to be bombarded...").

In 2003, People magazine and other non-parenting celebrity magazines were running the Bright Beginnings Instant Baby Formula ad featuring Brooke Shields as its pitch person (there was also a tv commercial that went along with it). While I appreciate that you are taking a stand on this issue, please note that it has been an issue for a long time and those just discovering it are rather late to the party. Better late than never, I guess.

StorkStories said...

Thanks for writing this and for sharing Marsha's letter. I WAS very disturbed by this although i had to say unfortunately that the designes of the ad were clever which further pissed me off. I am filing a complaint. I hope it helps...but since the USA hasn't endorsed the Code, I hope it will still be helpful. To your anonymous commentor: We Lactation Professional know that this is not a new problem. Far from it! I don't think Elita is portraying a misconception that this is new... In the 80's, (Ihope my memory is correct here) the ads you may see were NOT from the two most Physician recommended formulas.....Similac (Ross) and Enfamil (Mead Johnson). Ross Labs/Abbott alway USED to say that THEY were "abiding by the Code" even though Mead Johnson (who thru parent companies was related to Nestle at the time)WAS advertising directly to the consumer. These main 2 big formulas brands were staying out of the direct to consumer advertising market..... mostly. They started in the parenting type magazines.. but now garnering celebrity endorsements and moving to a different target audience in People Magazine...As far as I know THAT IS NEW and sad..very sad. And Brooke for Bright Beginnings (PBM Nutritionals)is a smaller company than the aforementioned formula giants and not as well known.

Elita said...

Anonymous, not sure why you felt the need to be rude, but in 2003 I was in my early 20s and not really giving much thought to breastfeeding or babies and didn't read People magazine. I guess I am "late to the party" because I only becoming a mother a year and a half ago.

Livewell said...

I recently received a package in the mail consisting of an insulated backpack, a bottle, a can of formula and some literature that was a smooth blend of useful information and propaganda.

This was a freebie from a mom forum I am a member of.

I thought to myself - if only breastfeeding groups had that kind of a budget!

What this promotion does, of course, is make it so that a new mother has a can of formula in the cupboard "just in case". I kept the cooler bag, and had an ethical struggle with what to do with the formula and the bottle. I ended up giving it to a woman who was already a committed bottle feeder. I felt like a traitor, or at the very least, a collaborator.

I would love to help support the breastfeeding cause more. Feel free to email me at wellness_info(at)yahoo(dot)ca

Elita said...

For those of you who would like to do more, you can donate money to an organization like Best for Babes, http://www.bestforbabes.org/donate/. You can also call your local WIC office and ask about working as a breastfeeding peer counselor part-time.

Bettina said...

Thank you Elita! This may no be new but the aggressiveness of the formula companies is getting worse. Moms have a right to make a decision of how to feed their babies without being undermined.

Elita said...

I still say this kind of thing is new because it's a new low: a glossy 4-page spread in a non-parenting magazine is UNHEARD OF. And honestly, regardless of what Bright Beginnings may have done 6 years ago, a one-page ad with a picture of Brooke Shields is not the same as these fancy, photo studio-esque pictures of a newborn. These images are VERY powerful, which is why formula companies are not allowed to put pictures of babies on the cans.

Justice Jonesie said...

Great post, thank you for sharing! It's great to see a young mom with the ability to influence others take a stand and empower other young moms.

Keep up the good work!

Joe said...

Thank you - great post. Shared on Facebook with an incentive to write to the magazine, and have done so myself.

I've added this paragraph to the letter, and I don't mind if anyone wants to use it as well!

"I understand that some people cannot breastfeed for medical reasons, or will choose not to breastfeed. The latter is always unfortunate, but especially so if the decision was reached through misinformation such as that promoted by ads like those found in your magazine. This prevents women from making an informed and conscious decision, and sets them to fail in their attempt to breastfeed, often before they have even given birth. This is especially true in this case, as your magazine is not specifically aimed at parents, but will reach thousands of women in childbearing ages."

Elita said...

Great letter, Joe, thanks for sharing.

Sassy said...

Hi there

Heres an interesting website written by a UK based Doctor. Her book Gut and Psychology Syndrome is available on amazon.com but firstly read her website and you will see that she places great importance on a new babies gut being populated with the right kind of 'flora' - the flora from mothers milk. She emphasises how the flora in the gut of a formula fed infant is very different than a breastfed infants.
http://www.gaps.me/preview/

Based on sound scientific evidence it is clearly about time formula milk came labelled with a clear health warning.

Also read Gabrielle Palmers updated book 'The Politics of Breastfeeding - When breasts are bad for business'

Naomi Baumslag & Dia L Michels book
Milk, Money, and Madness: The Culture and Politics of Breastfeeding

James Akres book The Problem with Breastfeeding (he correctly states that the biggest barrier to breastfeeding is society wide ignorance)

Related Posts with Thumbnails